Categorie archief: English

Posts in English language for non Dutch visitors

Testimonial Relationship Coaching – Samantha and Tye

Relationship Bliss – Testimonial Relationship Coaching

The Power of Presence

When coaching men about their relationship I often hear that they don’t know how to deal with (sometimes intense) emotional states of their partners. All of them, without exception, want to help, want to be there for her. But they don’t know how, and sometimes even gave up out of frustration and feeling powerless.

And the simple secret is … they don’t have to DO anything! The only thing required to be there for their partner is to be PRESENT. Meaning: aware of their own body and feelings, while allowing their loving, accepting attention to be with their woman. Without trying or wanting to change anything. Just being (OK) with what is.

Video Testimonial Relationship Coaching

One of the things I specially love about this wonderful testimonial is how Tye shares being more at ease with Samantha’s emotions, now knowing and applying this simple secret. Feel free to witness how much ease and relaxation Tye and Samantha achieved with very simple practices .. 🙂

Relationship Bliss

Relationship Bliss is a 4 session online training / coaching program for couples that provides practical tools, practices and skills to deepen connection, increase intimacy and to prevent and navigate conflict.

But foremost and above all Relationship Bliss is about creating, experiencing more JOY, in your relationship and personally.

About Samantha and Tye

Samantha and Tye Moe are successful business owners, Samantha as a parenting coach (www.mad2glad.com) and Tye as a family chiropractor (www.healthyfamilymn.com). They were married since about 6 months when they decided to participate in the Relationship Bliss program to bring their wonderful relationship to yet another level.

Their goal was to be able to connect and stay connected on a deep level despite busy work schedules and at times little time to spend together. They also wanted to deepen intimacy and especially create even greater (emotional) safety to be there for each other and support each other.

As an introduction to the video testimonial I love to share some written feedback Samantha sent previously:

“Henny is my favorite relationship coach who took my husband and I to the next level in our relationship. He helped us connect deeply in ways I didn’t even know how to ask for and helped us solidify our foundation so things became easier, more graceful, and gentle between us. As you can imagine this seeps into every area of our lives together.”

Watch and listen how this 4 session training improved their relationship. I hope you enjoy it as much as I do. The warm and light hearted energy in this testimonial is an excellent reflection of the fun and playfulness during our sessions 🙂

Thank you, Samantha and Tye, for your open and generous sharing!

And please feel free to leave your comment or ask any question inspired by this video or about creating a fullfilling, love-full relationship below!

Safety First – How To Restore Connection In Relationships

Restore Connection? Safety First!

To restore connection in relationships when one is in distress, or even worse, when both are, can be a cumbersome challenge as many have experienced. Especially since autonomous physiological responses can get in the way!

Safety First

What happens when we feel stressed, meaning we don’t feel safe? Our system is perfectly equipped for scanning danger and to respond to perceived threats in a way that secure survival. Now, as “evolved” humans in modern society we rarely find ourselves in really life threatening circumstances. However, this doesn’t prevent that some conditions might be interpreted by our nervous system as unsafe, evoking similar responses as in situations where our life is at stake.

How does that play out in our relationships? Well, an argument, or a fight, or fear of losing connection are all conditions that alarm our survival system. Here is how that works, according to research by scientist Stephen Porges

Social behavior influenced by physiology

During the evolution of mankind three systems developed, one on top of the other, to cope with danger and to make us feel safe again. When triggered by a threatening event, we utilize them in a top down order, first trying to respond from the most modern (and advanced) system. Then, if that doesn’t restore the balance and a sense of safety, an older system gets activated and when even with that the feeling of unsafety sustains, we start responding from the oldest, most primitive system.
(for more details about this life saving program as described in what Dr. Stephen Porges has named “Polyvagal Theory”, check out this article or this Wikipedia item)

This means that we:

  1. First try to respond from the “social engagement system”, which supports us to listen better, to make eye contact and connect with others. However, we need some base line of safety for this system to be active. If that minimum safety is not in place, we have little or no access to it and we will fall back on the next system in the hierarchy.
  2. Secondly try to respond from the “adrenal sympathetic system”, which mobilizes the more instinctive fight or flight behaviors. When this also doesn’t bring us relief and a basic feeling of safety, we’ll fall back even one level deeper in the hierarchy.
  3. Finally we react from the “vagal system”, which is a freeze or shutdown response.

Primal responses expressed in relationship dynamics

Isn’t that how things go when we feel stressed, pressured, disrespected, ignored or hurt in a relationship? That we first try to engage, to talk, to get in touch, to come to understanding and agreement (connect), and when that fails we tend to – often while not wanting to – start arguing, manipulating, forcing or maybe avoiding contact, keeping distance, or leaving (fight or flight). And when that all doesn’t restore safety, we might with time be subject to depression or burnout (freeze or shutdown). Where systems are being shut down, their functioning reduced to a minimum, to keep energy available for survival.

Can you see how this relates to three common destructive patterns in relationships, with the first two (‘attack-attack’ and ‘attack-withdraw’) as examples of the fight or flight response, and the third one (‘withdraw-withdraw’) as an example of the freeze or shutdown response. Of course the second pattern (‘attack-withdraw’) might as well be a mix, if one partner predominantly is in attack mode and the other predominantly in withdraw mode.

Now, what is the relevance of all this stuff for us in our relationships, and or longing for connection and intimacy? Well, lack of (experienced) safety obviously gets in the way of our ability to relate. And this partly happens on a subconscious level, by a hyper vigilant nervous system, that constantly is on guard, always scanning for danger and possible threats. We only have access to our (younger) social engagement system when our nervous system evaluates our conditions as safe.

To restore connection take a deep breath first

So, what can we do to restore connection, given all of this? How can we use this knowledge to improve our relationships?

Pause
Here are some suggestions to disarm our defensive strategies and relax our nervous system:

  • When you notice you feel anxious, on guard, or even are aware that part of you doesn’t feel safe, take care of yourself and adjust what you need to feel (more) safe. Ask for what you need, or make time and space for you to recover and restore safety.
    It is interesting that breathing exercises, meditation, singing and facial gymnastics might be helpful, since the part of our nervous system that is related to our facial expression, to listening and to our heart and our lungs is the same.
  • Be gentle with yourself when in distress. Moving to a quiet(er) space, and reduce activity is also helpful to have better access to our social engagement system.
  • Be gentle with another who is in distress. If you’re with another who is upset, you can guide that person to a space that is (more) quiet and offers less stimuli. Talk with a soft voice and friendly tone to calm them down and to support them to feel more safe. Just inviting them to breath consciously can be very helpful too.
  • Be aware that you, or another, possibly will misread social cues when in a state of arousal. What will appear as a neutral face to a relaxed person, might be perceived as angry, or disapproving, or judging when that defensive physiology is activated (out of precaution this system evaluates everything on a conservative level related to survival).
  • Create agreements about how you want to relate to and engage with each other to create a safe container for your relationship. And preferably include agreements on how to deal with circumstances where one of you is, or even both are, upset.

Responsiveness beats defensiveness

All of this could be summarized in one short statement: SAFETY FIRST! Don’t try to solve any argument without first calming down yourself and the other, re-establishing a base of feeling safe again. Wasn’t a bad advice after all, to first count to ten …

When you feel calm and safe (enough), check with the other if they also are in a good enough space to make an attempt to reconnect successfully. Take it slow (anything too fast or sudden will be interpreted as danger and might cause a fall back to defensiveness) and honor your (and their) body’s responses. Don’t push, be gentle. And, if available, be responsive, engage! Responsiveness (e.g. by  eye contact, facial expression, sound or breath, body posture, or confirmative and reassuring words) adds tremendously to feelings of safety with another.

Have fun playing with this and if you feel inspired, leave a comment below. I love to read it … and to be “responsive”! 😉

Is Being SELFish OK?

That’s a big one, isn’t it?

Is being SELFish OK?

An invitation to exchange flawed premises (routes to UNhappiness) for supportive beliefs (routes to JOY).

Many of us don’t feel very successful in their pursuit of JOY and their desire to do good.
We are trained to buy in to flawed premises that are very successful roads to UNhappiness …

  • We think we are not good (enough) or not complete
  • We think we need to become something we are not in order to be good
  • We look outside of us to decide what is good, what is correct, what is right for us
  • We trust our conditioned thinking more than our emotions
  • We think there are limited resources, there is not enough for everyone (and for us), we fear lack
  • We believe being selfish is wrong
  • We think that love is something we get or give
  • We worship hard work, pain and sacrifice
  • We think we need to protect ourselves for all we fear could go wrong
  • We believe that action is the dominant player to realize what we want

How about changing those premises for these?
And (re-)training ourselves into believes that are roads to success an and JOY …

  • I am good as I am, I always have been and I always will be
  • I am free to think what I think, believe what I believe and want what I want
  • I am the only one who can know what is right for me
  • My emotions are my guidance system, are the voice of my inner being
  • Resources are unlimited and I am an eternal being
  • It is good to be selfish and make it a priority to feel good and take are for myself first
  • I AM love: love is me being connected to the goodness that I am
  • I worship feeling good, the path of least resistance and effortless creation
  • Well being is the basis of life
  • My thinking and feeling is the most dominant player to realize what I want

I believe we all are innate good beings, with a desire to do good, to uplift, to support, to share, to give and receive. When we decide to be selfishly focused on feeling good, being and doing good to others will be the inevitable, natural consequence.

Credits
Image: Pixabay
Inspiration: Abraham-Hicks

Don’t look back

Don’t look back!

I love this idea of not looking back other than to enjoy and revel in wonderful memories. I understand that there is little benefit in regret. Or maybe no benefit at all.

Abraham-Hicks - Don't Look Back

Any justification going on in our minds or towards others is saying: I believe I did something wrong and now I have to make it right. And that’s not possible. Since there is nothing tot make right. Since there is nothing wrong.

The only result of any justification (and o boy, how much I sometimes noticed parts of me keeping itself busy with that game!), is keeping that vibration of “I’ve done something wrong” or “I should have known better” or “What will others think about that?” etc, active. Keeping this idea of wrong doing, not being good (enough) dominant in my vibration. And that doesn’t serve me!

I love Abe’s interpretation of negative emotion: guidance from my inner being, making clear that what a part of me is thinking is not resonating, not in line, not aligned with what the source in me is thinking about the same subject.
So then regret would mean: I think I did something wrong and my inner being doesn’t. I think I should have done different and my inner being knows I always do the best I can in that moment.

So now I am alert … and intend to catch any justification or regret in the most early stages. I observe what my mind is doing and then simply say: “Thank you for your concern … and now I’m going to give my attention to something else …”

That is what is meant by deliberate creation … deliberate thinking … deliberate focusing. Choosing the thoughts I want to think. Choosing the reality I want to live. Choosing the truth I want to be true.

Inspired by this quote of Abraham-Hicks:

“We would spend no time looking back in any sort of justification of anything that you’ve decided.”

 

Credits: picture by Greyerbaby on Pixabay.com. Thanks!

Too stupid

301296
The Shawshank Redemption Blues

 

It’s too stupid
not to enjoy life
it’s too stupid
not to enjoy every single moment

Please, my love
do what’s good for yourself

not what’s good for him
not what’s good for me

what’s good for you
is good for the world

It’s too stupid
not to give your love to life
it’s too stupid
not to give your life to love

 

I enjoy every moment we are together
I also want to learn to enjoy
the moments that I miss you

It’s too stupid
to spoil any second
I can enjoy my love for you
your love for me

Even when you’re not there
even when we are within these walls
of the prison we choose to live in

I will be with you
anytime
anywhere
anyhow

 

But the truth is
that I want to share
every moment
every thought
every emotion
my entire life
with you

Stupid,
isn’t it?

Solve Relationship Problems by Recognizing 3 Destructive Patterns

Love in a blind alley and you want to solve relationship problems?

Solve Relationship Problems - Two SwansRecognizing three destructive patterns can restore lost intimacy and solve relationship problems.

When we get engaged in a new relationship, we feel strongly attracted to our new love. We feel deeply connected and our heart feels warm and open. We feel at home, safe and dare to be vulnerable, we dare to really open up.

How can it happen that that – sometimes so soon already – can change, that the bond of love and cherished intimacy seems to disappear and arguments and an air of distance take their place?

How can it happen that so many relationships in the course of the years change in an emotional arena, in extreme cases even in a battle field or scorched desert, or in a chilly ice field? How is it possible that the partner you love so much, seems to have become that unattainable?

Learn below how you can recognize 3 destructive patterns in order to save your relationship. Learn that all these patterns are just a signal of an intense, unanswered, desperate desire.

Intimacy kills intimacy

That is an odd sentence, isn’t it? And yet, there is a lot of truth in it. The same thing we long for so much, the intimacy that makes us feel connected with our beloved, the very safety that enables that intimacy, can at the same time be the death blow for that intimacy and connection.

Attachment is a survival program

Attachment, feeling emotional connected, apparently is not only a fundamental need for children. Also for adults it is a deep, natural longing, related to our survival instincts. When that deep emotional bond with our beloved partner is at stake, a primal panic arises. Dr. Sue Johnson poses in her book ‘Hold me tight’ that the desire for emotional connection (“attachment”) even supersedes our need for food or sex! Isn’t it interesting then, how seeking comfort or distraction in the fridge or the next petting-party often is a frequently practiced remedy for the pain of experienced lack of feeling connected.

The perils of safety

Again a strange sentence. Yet a paradox that certainly applies to relationships. It is very normal to have more conflicts in close relationships. For the very fact that they offer that much safety. Since we feel safe with our partner, we dare to open up more, we allow our partner closer than others and we show more of ourselves. This causes that we feel more vulnerable and that we can be triggered more lightly. Do you recognize that exactly the person you love the most, also is able to push your sensitive buttons the most?

Another aspect is that many of us in the past have collected some bruises in intimate relationships. They have suffered periods of time wherein they lacked that longed for connection so dearly. Due to their experiences possibly even started to doubt whether they are worthy enough of a tight relationship. Doubt whether they are good enough to be loved. The safety of an intimate relationship brings us, except from in contact with our desire for that connection, also in contact with the pain of the lack of it, and the fear of not being worth it. What then can make us close again (if we don’t know this mechanism!).

The safe connection with our partner is so important for us, that we, so to speak from mortal fear, can react very intense when we perceive a threat of losing it. At which we can get entangled in patterns that distance us even further from our partner – and sometimes even distance us from our contact with our own desire for that connection. While we get caught in this – actually desperate – strategies, thinking that we are fighting for our survival, we are not aware anymore that what we miss is the intimate connection and that what we need most is getting closer.

How now, can you solve relationship problems and save your relationship, if your relationship got lost in a dead alley and you and your partner got distanced from each other? If it’s indeed the case that your relationship is an emotional arena or emotional desert. Or even worse, a battle field or ice plain?

Recognizing destructive patterns

Solve Relationship Problems - Fighting Couple

The first step you can take is to be aware and acknowledge that there is a need to come closer within you and that what you missing is emotional connection. Next to recognize how you respond to the threat of losing that safe connection. Below you find three most common patterns, as described by Dr. Sue Johnson in her book ‘Hold me tight’, as a result of observing couples in stagnating relationships for decades. She calls them “diabolic dialogues”.

1. attack – attack

This is the pattern of attack and counter attack. Fights, arguments. The pot calling the kettle black. One partner blames the other and the other responds with a next accusation. Nobody listens to the other, both only try to “score”. There is a drive to point out who is de cause of the problems – and off course that is the other (“not me, but you”). The search for the offender, trying to proof who is to blame is fruitless, while it increases the feeling of unsafety and the lack of attachment and connection (as also the fear of losing the other). It maintains a downwards spiral of more and more intense accusations to and fro and further drifting apart.

It by the way doesn’t even matter that much whether you really live out this game, or whether you play it mainly in your head, and the blaming is merely an internal dialogue – both are as killing …

2. attack – withdraw

In this second pattern, that often follows the previous one, both partners each develop a different self preserving strategy. It is kind of casting, whereby one is demanding and the other withdraws. One complains and attacks and blames, and the other persists more and more in silence, take a distance and become unattainable. This can also be expressed as nitpicking and defending. Often either of both have a fixed role in this game, but roles also can alternate, depending on the situation.

One partner more and more harries the other, as a firm protest against continuing absence of emotional response and loss of connection. The other feels falling short over and over and closes down more and more for unpleasant feelings, both their own feelings as those of the other. Both the attacking and demanding, and the silencing and withdrawing are counterproductive reactions to lack of closeness, to encroachment of the safety of feeling at home with the other. Both don’t feel seen and desperately alone. Also this pattern is like more and more ardently trampling in quicksand, while further and further sinking in.

3. withdraw – withdraw

When those previous emergency strategies don’t work, the relationship can reach a point where both partners give up, and withdraw. The freeze and flee. In the best scenario resulting in a emotional desert, a relationship that withered en parced, but in more extreme cases can turn into a cold, hostile ice plain. Each partner has given up on trying to, or even wanting to reach the outer en the relationship evaporates a scorched desperation. Blunted, depleted, disillusionate. Cut off from their own feelings and needs and from those of the other. Intimacy has extinguished and the social intercourse is mechanical, functional (if not hostile). Possibly seeking consolation and solace in addictions or other relationships.

Are you entangled in one of these patterns? Or do you see that you went through more of them? Do you recognize that your real longing is to come closer, to restore the connection? Do you want to solve your relationship problems and save you relationship? Recognizing and acknowledging these destructive patterns, preferably in the moment you live them, is a first step!

Solve relationship problems

Solve Relationship Problems - I Miss YouDo you see how these patterns are rooted in our most primitive survival responses? That indicates how stressful loss of connection is, since these responses (fight, flight, freeze) are primal autopilot habits in circumstances that our autonomous nervous system experiences as life threatening.

All those patterns conceal the real need: coming closer. Restoration of emotional connection. Loving intimacy. Being heard, being seen, being felt. Feeling safe in the presence of the other, especially in your most vulnerable moments. Knowing that the other is there when you need them.

Step 1 – Recognize your pattern (or patterns)

If you want to restore intimacy, solve relationship problems and save or improve your relationship, you can start with recognizing these patterns. By becoming aware that your are captured by a destructive survival strategy, you will gradually be able to observe, witness with more distance. Maybe you want to share with your partner what you became aware of.

Step 2 – Acknowledge your need

Check in with yourself what is your real need in the moment that you attack or withdraw. Be aware that loss of connection triggers your primal survival mechanisms and that what you really want is restoration of connection. That you want to feel safe with your partner and that you need the attention of the other. May you could also share this with your partner, let them know what your real longing is, let them know what you miss and need.

Note: this can be a difficult step! It can bring you in touch with the pain of not fulfilled needs, and insecurity you experienced in moments you felt vulnerable and needed support while not getting it.

Step 3 – Know that both of you are in the same boat

Know that your partner struggles with the same problem as you do. Even if that might show different than with you. Know that your partner’s desire basically is the same as yours: a need for connection, security to know to be able to count on you. And know that your partner’s fear is the same as yours: the fear to lose you. Awareness that you both are in the same boat, even if both may express that differently, acknowledgement that the other wants and needs you as much as you want and need them, can help to stop the blaming and seeking of a wrongdoer.

Step 4 – Step out of the pattern

Often this is the hardest step. Try if you can catch yourself when you’re in the pattern, when you see that the destructive mechanism is active. And step on a pedal. See if you can stop, if you can step out. Look whether you can get still for a moment, still inside, and whether you’re able to get in touch with what it is that you really want and need. Conscious that your longing for connection is moving you.

Now, in many cases this is not easy, it requires courage to do this, to be the first to step out. Imagine two attackers facing each other in an alley, both their knives ready to strike. Both got their knives out because they felt threatened, only wanting to protect themselves. Actually none of them wants to hurt the other, but both are afraid to be hurt. Who drops his knife first? (Or: who decides to leave their shelter first in case of withdrawal?). That is taking a risk. It requires to show up vulnerable, before having absolute certainty that your safety is guaranteed.

Step 6 – Show up

To be seen you need to be visible. To be met in your need requires that those needs are known. When you have been able to recognize the destructive pattern and stop it, you can make first steps to get closer. To restore the connection. By expressing how you feel and what you need. By sharing what you miss and what you long for.

Again, this also is not always as easy. The fat can be in the fire in no time. It is an art to share one’s desires and feelings, without making another responsible for them, and without making the other feel they do something wrong or fall short. How easy a blame or a resentment can be hidden in our words (or our energy – because it doesn’t matter whether we only feel and think something, or actually – whether more or less covered or not – really articulate it).

This step requires that we learn to communicate from our heart.

Communication from our heart

Solve Relationship Problems - CoupleLearning to communicate from our heart is a journey in itself. A delightful journey by the way. And THE medicine for a healthy relationship. Whether you want to learn it because your relationship is in a dead alley and you want to solve your relationship problems and save your relationship, or because you are enjoying a wonderful relationship and you want to bring it yet another step further, you want to deepen your connection even more.

Communicating from our heart is an art, and also a “practice”, something that improves by exercise. It requires from us to be able to hear the voice of our heart and then have the skill set to speak from the heart.

If that is something you would like support with, feel free to get in touch with me to explore how you can learn that. You can skype me (cramerscoach), FaceTime me (+31 6 242 131 33) or send me an e-mail (coach@hennycramers.com).

I hope this article helps you to let your relationship thrive. I am curious to read your response. Feel free to share your reaction and your own experiences. Or to ask your questions, I will reply in person.

Note
In her book Dr. Sue Johnson calls the three patterns “demon dialogues” and gives them the names “Find the Bad Guy” (1), “The Protest Polka” (2) and “Freeze and Flee” (3).

Sources
Dr. Sue Johnson – ‘Hold me thight
Foto’s: PixaBay

Hold Me Tight – Dr. Sue Johnson

Hold Me Tight
Hold Me Tight - Dr. Sue Johnson

A wonderful book packed with very recognizable conversations, amazing insights and very practicle tips.

Written by Dr. Sue Johnson, a clinical psychologist, professor and author, after decades of research and couple therapy.

Dr. Johnson analysed probably thousands of sessions with couples, during over 25 years of practice, which finally led her to an approach that works: Emotionally Focused Therapy.

I also love this book since the body of work she presents from my perspective resonates so much with the Heart Intelligence approach to relationships. Christian Pankhurst, founder of Heart IQ, is one of my primary sources of inspiration last years.

Myriads of examples as stunning mirrors

It is not only the deeply resonating insights that she presents, but also the abundance of examples she provides, that make this such an outstanding book for me. I can imagine almost anyone who has been in a relationship or marriage for more than a couple of years, will recognize so much in the conversations of all those couples who are struggling to make their relationship work. I did for sure!

Must read

As far as I’m concerned this book is a must read for anyone who wants to create or maintain an healthy relationship. It supports us to recognize how our needs and fears often drive us apart, while not knowing that our not working behavior is coming from a desire to (re)connect and to feel safe in the relationship.

It helps us to be aware of destructive dialogue patterns, to stop them and to start developing new, healthy, connecting communication from the heart.

Mythes cracked

In one of the first pages Dr. Sue Johnson shares some myths that have contributed to a lot of adult relationship misery:

  1. Adults need to (be able) to control (read: suppress) their emotions.
  2. To much emotions are at the root of relationship problems. One should not give in to or listen to their emotions.
  3. Mature adults are independent and unattached.

In the second chapter she continues with some ideas about love professed by many, including researchers and therapists, at the time that aren’t very helpful either:

  1. Love is a temporary, sexual spur of the moment.
  2. Love is an immature need to lean on others.
  3. Love is a moral attitude, that has more to do with giving then with any needs or receiving.

However, it turned out that ‘effective dependency’ (Bowlby) is an important, if not crucial ingrediënt of healthy, lasting relationships. Which reminds me of David Deida‘s conception ‘interdepency’ as the final stage of sound development of a relationship.
In other words: Bowlby’s ‘attachment theory’ would not only apply to children, but also to adults. There is a (natural) need for emotional connection and it would be considered a sign and source of strength to be able to reach out for emotional support.

Recipe for better relationship

In her book ‘Hold Me Thight’ Dr. Sue Johnson presents seven conversations for a lifetime of love. Here is my short version of what I see as the core of these practices:

  1. Recognize demon dialogues
    • attack – counter attack
    • atack – defense
    • retreat – retreat
  2. Acknowledge needs and pain
    • need = connection, attachment, safety
    • pain = old pain (triggered pain body)
  3. De-escalate & reconnect
    • recognize and stop the “game” (= demon dialogue)
    • accept responsibility for own part or role in the “game” (both behavior and feelings / emotions)
    • acknowledge own contribution in triggering the other
    • connect to (underlying) vulnerable feelings: of self and partner
    • agree on something shared to work towards together

Recommendation

Of course this review / personal summary can’t be a substitute for this valuable book itself. So from the bottom of my heart I recommend reading it and keep it as reference, as your medicine in times of relationship trouble. And another benefit: you’ll see you’re not the only one!

Dr. Sue Johnson, ‘Hold Me Tight’, 320 pages (USA 2008)
ISBN 9780316113007

On the author’s website: ‘Hold Me Tight
On Amazon: Kindle edition, Hardcover
On Barnes & Nobles: Hardcover & Nook book

Related Articles

SOLVE RELATIONSHIP PROBLEMS BY RECOGNIZING 3 DESTRUCTIVE PATTERNS

A matter of guilt

Do You Matter?

And do you feel guilt when you think you don’t?

Guilt

This morning I received an inspirational message which said:

“God says that guilt is the feeling that keeps you stuck in who you are not.
What can you do to change that?
More importantly, are you willing to change that?”

Now, this message comes from a highly valued source, Humanity’s Team, which is related to Neale Donald Walsch, who’s books ‘Conversations with God‘ are incredible resources, highly inspiring and very much appreciated by me.

http://www.andrewgable.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/guilt1.jpgYes, I suppose guilt is one of the most devastating diminishing disempowering states of being we know, especially since most guilt is coming from conditioning, and not from our heart. Coming from others wanting us to be or do what we are not. So yes, it keeps us stuck in what we are not.

To me it’s interesting how the questions then are posed here: “what can you do to change that?” “are you willing to change that?”, which may evoke new guilt if one feels not being able to do that (one should …).

I notice that I would like questions like “would you want to change that?”, “wouldn’t be nice to change that?”, “how would it be to change that?” (or “to let go of that”).

Matter

For me my response to the Inspirational Message also relates to some thoughts I had this morning. About the idea that it is important to “matter”. In personal development world that also is an often posed question: “Do you matter?” Or a questions we are invited to ask ourselves at the end of a day or the end of our lifes: “Did I matter?”

To be honest I less and less fancy any question that has the slightest “imposing” energy in it, the slightest “should” hidden in there. The question “Do you matter” can evoke massive feelings of guilt and short coming. Desperate seeking for ways to matter.

Our very being here in this plane IS what matters, it matters in itself. We don’t have to create that. Nor do we have to leave a “legacy” (another popular concept in personal development industry and goal setting practice).

Isn’t striving to matter just another way to give the ego something to be satisfied about, something to identify with, to be “something” (“good”, “valuable”). Isn’t it just another way to fill the (conditioned) void of feeling not worthy? Where we have to DO something, to ACHIEVE something to BE someone? To gain worth? Where it is not about the fun and excitement and joy of the doing, but about the reward of the achieving. The reward of having added to ourselves, to the idea that we have become more and therefore more worthy, more valuable.

I feel like I am becoming more and more aware, more and more sensitive, of these subtle, by the way very well meant, conditionings. And I am not buying them anymore.

What matters to me is that I enjoy life, that I value life, that I appreciate being here in this plane. Whatever that looks like.

We ARE life, we ARE love, we ARE matter (as we are spirit as well) … there is nothing for us to DO to accomplish that, or to make that more.

http://www.capturedbycarrie.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/1109-newborn-baby-photographer.jpg

Credits

Thank you for the wonderful images to
Andrew Gable (drawing link)
Carrie Sandoval (photograph link)